![]() |
![]() |
notebook weblog | newquaker.com |
![]() |
© Merle Harton, Jr. | About | XML/RSS ![]() Saturday, March 26, 2005
To err on the side of a partridge egg. I used to think that I had my living will all figured out. I thought, too, that Michael Shiavo's testimony about his wife's wishes was really sufficient to rest the issue of her feeding tube's removal, but Dr. William P. Cheshire Jr.'s March 24th formal affidavit[.pdf] written in support of Terri Schiavo's continued feeding and care has me rethinking the issue, despite some cantankerous attacks on Dr. Cheshire's motivations.[1] All things considered, the disabled Terri Schiavo deserves another chance here. "Based on this evidence, I believe that, within a reasonable degree of medical certainty, there is a greater likelihood that Terri is in a minimally conscious state than a persistent vegetative state. This distinction makes an enormous difference in making ethical decisions on Terri's behalf. If Terri is sufficiently aware of her surroundings that she can feel pleasure and suffer, if she is capable of understanding to some degree how she is being treated, then in my judgment it would be wrong to bring about her death by withdrawing food and water."[3] This contradicts the testimony of "Dr. Ronald Cranford, a neurologist and medical ethicist at the University of Minnesota Medical School who has examined Ms. Schiavo on behalf of the Florida courts and declared her to be irredeemably brain-damaged." Said Dr. Cranford: "I have no idea who this Cheshire is.... He has to be bogus, a pro-life fanatic. You'll not find any credible neurologist or neurosurgeon to get involved at this point and say she's not vegetative." "Her CAT scan shows massive shrinkage of the brain.... Her EEG is flatflat. There's no electrical activity coming from her brain."[4] My point is that we may well have here opposite camps divided by evidential data that is more philosophical than scientific. So long as the weight of the evidence for Terri's status as a conscious human being rests preponderantly on tests for physical functioning, it will seem to be okay to withhold life-support from this woman who now so badly needs the benefit of the doubt. I think that Dr. Cheshire's social evidence ought at least to create a chilling pause in these theatrical protestations, if not go further and call into question the line of evidence that is bent towards a flat-line materialism. 1. New York Times, March 25, 2005. ![]() Friday, March 25, 2005
Quaker eyes on peace. The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) has a powerful 2-minute flash film, "Wage Peace," for viewing online or as a 858 KB ZIP folder for convenient downloading.[1] 1. The Wage Peace movie is a free download, although you can also purchase it in DVD or VHS format for $10. ![]() Sunday, March 20, 2005
Purple fingers, wax lips. Like Vietnam, I think we'd all like the conflict in Iraq to be over with. Of course, it isn't going away, except you couldn't tell that from the coverage of events over there by the faux news. There really isn't much to report, huh? That's one of the big differences between Vietnam and Iraqthe television isn't covered with death and destruction as it was in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Then it was everywhere; now you have to hunt for it. "What is interesting about this whole process is that all of the flights of wounded into the United States are scheduled to land at night. The wounded are arriving under the cover of darkness. Also, at least at the two hospitals, Walter Reed Army Medical Center and Bethesda Naval Medical Center, photographers and the press are barred from seeing, watching, or taking photos of the wounded arriving. So, if you take those two facts, the fact that the wounded are only arriving at night at Andrews Air Force Base, and you take the fact that we in the press are not allowed to see them when they go to the two main hospitals here, we have a situation where we're several years into the war now, and we've seen essentially no reporting or no images of these wounded arriving; and to give you just a idea of the scope of this situation, if you take the wounded soldiers and then you add in the number of hurt soldiers that the Pentagon doesn't generally report (in other words, soldiers that are hurt in vehicle accidents and so on) we have 25,000 soldiers who have been flown out of the battlefields, mostly from Iraq, some from Afghanistan. Most of those come back to the United States25,000and images or reporting on them arriving in the United States is almost unheard of."[3] As if to bring this all full circle, the Pentagon is now making the preemptive attack, or what it calls "active deterrence," a key part of its approved strategic plans.[4] 1. AP, Washington Post, March 17, 2005. The AP feed is archived at Common Dreams News Center. ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |